Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Male
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Carolina

City Single Male Poverty vs State vs National
1. Hampton 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#1 12.4% (+87.6)#61
2. St George 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#2 12.4% (+87.6)#107
3. Winnsboro Mills 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#3 12.4% (+87.6)#127
4. Catawba 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#4 12.4% (+87.6)#156
5. Seabrook 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#5 12.4% (+87.6)#216
6. Yemassee 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#6 12.4% (+87.6)#248
7. Dovesville 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#7 12.4% (+87.6)#254
8. Reevesville 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#8 12.4% (+87.6)#568
9. Hodges 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#9 12.4% (+87.6)#692
10. Bradley 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#10 12.4% (+87.6)#712
11. Willington 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#11 12.4% (+87.6)#825
12. Clarks Hill 100.0% 15.6% (+84.4)#12 12.4% (+87.6)#832
13. Clifton 96.1% 15.6% (+80.5)#13 12.4% (+83.7)#914
14. Whitmire 93.2% 15.6% (+77.6)#14 12.4% (+80.7)#926
15. Ridgeville 85.7% 15.6% (+70.1)#15 12.4% (+73.3)#995
16. Allendale 85.5% 15.6% (+69.9)#16 12.4% (+73.1)#1,008
17. Wedgefield 84.8% 15.6% (+69.2)#17 12.4% (+72.4)#1,017
18. Camden 84.2% 15.6% (+68.5)#18 12.4% (+71.7)#1,029
19. Eutawville 81.8% 15.6% (+66.2)#19 12.4% (+69.4)#1,066
20. Lynchburg 80.0% 15.6% (+64.4)#20 12.4% (+67.6)#1,101
21. Sellers 80.0% 15.6% (+64.4)#21 12.4% (+67.6)#1,111
22. Graniteville 79.2% 15.6% (+63.5)#22 12.4% (+66.7)#1,117
23. Westminster 75.6% 15.6% (+60.0)#23 12.4% (+63.2)#1,179
24. Marion 74.6% 15.6% (+59.0)#24 12.4% (+62.2)#1,229
25. Andrews 73.6% 15.6% (+58.0)#25 12.4% (+61.2)#1,241
26. Johnston 71.7% 15.6% (+56.1)#26 12.4% (+59.3)#1,275
27. Ward 71.4% 15.6% (+55.8)#27 12.4% (+59.0)#1,305
28. Santee 70.0% 15.6% (+54.4)#28 12.4% (+57.6)#1,338
29. Saluda 68.2% 15.6% (+52.6)#29 12.4% (+55.8)#1,391
30. Stateburg 68.2% 15.6% (+52.6)#30 12.4% (+55.7)#1,393
31. Denmark 66.7% 15.6% (+51.0)#31 12.4% (+54.2)#1,415
32. Cherryvale 66.7% 15.6% (+51.0)#32 12.4% (+54.2)#1,416
33. Prosperity 65.7% 15.6% (+50.1)#33 12.4% (+53.3)#1,497
34. Ware Shoals 65.3% 15.6% (+49.7)#34 12.4% (+52.9)#1,508
35. Dalzell 64.7% 15.6% (+49.1)#35 12.4% (+52.3)#1,526
36. Watts Mills 61.7% 15.6% (+46.0)#36 12.4% (+49.2)#1,647
37. Orangeburg 54.8% 15.6% (+39.2)#37 12.4% (+42.4)#1,972
38. Great Falls 54.5% 15.6% (+38.9)#38 12.4% (+42.1)#1,981
39. Bethune 54.5% 15.6% (+38.9)#39 12.4% (+42.1)#1,991
40. Neeses 54.5% 15.6% (+38.9)#40 12.4% (+42.1)#1,992
41. Pageland 53.2% 15.6% (+37.6)#41 12.4% (+40.8)#2,063
42. Arkwright 52.1% 15.6% (+36.5)#42 12.4% (+39.7)#2,129
43. Carlisle 50.0% 15.6% (+34.4)#43 12.4% (+37.6)#2,277
44. West Union 50.0% 15.6% (+34.4)#44 12.4% (+37.6)#2,295
45. Hartsville 49.5% 15.6% (+33.8)#45 12.4% (+37.0)#2,403
46. Southern Shops 48.4% 15.6% (+32.8)#46 12.4% (+36.0)#2,447
47. Fountain Inn 48.4% 15.6% (+32.7)#47 12.4% (+35.9)#2,450
48. Abbeville 46.9% 15.6% (+31.3)#48 12.4% (+34.5)#2,524
49. Florence 46.3% 15.6% (+30.7)#49 12.4% (+33.9)#2,563
50. Pickens 45.9% 15.6% (+30.3)#50 12.4% (+33.5)#2,599
51. Salley 45.5% 15.6% (+29.8)#51 12.4% (+33.0)#2,629
52. East Gaffney 44.1% 15.6% (+28.5)#52 12.4% (+31.7)#2,712
53. Dentsville 43.7% 15.6% (+28.0)#53 12.4% (+31.2)#2,751
54. Seneca 42.9% 15.6% (+27.2)#54 12.4% (+30.4)#2,783
55. Eastover 42.9% 15.6% (+27.2)#55 12.4% (+30.4)#2,802
56. Mccoll 42.5% 15.6% (+26.9)#56 12.4% (+30.1)#2,835
57. Burton 42.1% 15.6% (+26.4)#57 12.4% (+29.6)#2,869
58. Timmonsville 41.9% 15.6% (+26.3)#58 12.4% (+29.5)#2,875
59. Summerton 41.7% 15.6% (+26.0)#59 12.4% (+29.2)#2,901
60. Scranton 41.2% 15.6% (+25.6)#60 12.4% (+28.7)#2,944
61. Eureka Mill 39.3% 15.6% (+23.7)#61 12.4% (+26.9)#3,145
62. Gadsden 39.2% 15.6% (+23.6)#62 12.4% (+26.7)#3,156
63. Kershaw 38.8% 15.6% (+23.2)#63 12.4% (+26.4)#3,182
64. Judson 38.2% 15.6% (+22.6)#64 12.4% (+25.8)#3,225
65. Duncan 37.4% 15.6% (+21.8)#65 12.4% (+25.0)#3,310
66. Calhoun Falls 37.1% 15.6% (+21.5)#66 12.4% (+24.7)#3,328
67. Lamar 37.0% 15.6% (+21.4)#67 12.4% (+24.6)#3,333
68. Piedmont 36.4% 15.6% (+20.8)#68 12.4% (+24.0)#3,371
69. Iva 35.9% 15.6% (+20.3)#69 12.4% (+23.5)#3,441
70. Beaufort 35.8% 15.6% (+20.2)#70 12.4% (+23.4)#3,449
71. Homeland Park 35.6% 15.6% (+20.0)#71 12.4% (+23.2)#3,471
72. Saxon 35.4% 15.6% (+19.8)#72 12.4% (+23.0)#3,493
73. Easley 35.2% 15.6% (+19.6)#73 12.4% (+22.7)#3,516
74. Gilbert 35.0% 15.6% (+19.4)#74 12.4% (+22.6)#3,545
75. Red Hill 35.0% 15.6% (+19.4)#75 12.4% (+22.5)#3,546
76. Hanahan 34.3% 15.6% (+18.7)#76 12.4% (+21.9)#3,602
77. Greeleyville 33.3% 15.6% (+17.7)#77 12.4% (+20.9)#3,751
78. Vance 33.3% 15.6% (+17.7)#78 12.4% (+20.9)#3,823
79. Cayce 33.2% 15.6% (+17.5)#79 12.4% (+20.7)#3,836
80. Gaffney 32.9% 15.6% (+17.3)#80 12.4% (+20.5)#3,847
81. Belton 31.9% 15.6% (+16.3)#81 12.4% (+19.5)#3,950
82. Laurens 31.5% 15.6% (+15.8)#82 12.4% (+19.0)#3,999
83. Edgefield 31.4% 15.6% (+15.8)#83 12.4% (+19.0)#4,007
84. Powdersville 31.4% 15.6% (+15.8)#84 12.4% (+19.0)#4,010
85. Woodfield 30.8% 15.6% (+15.1)#85 12.4% (+18.3)#4,065
86. Chester 29.6% 15.6% (+14.0)#86 12.4% (+17.1)#4,228
87. Spartanburg 29.6% 15.6% (+13.9)#87 12.4% (+17.1)#4,233
88. Camp Croft 29.0% 15.6% (+13.4)#88 12.4% (+16.6)#4,284
89. East Sumter 28.6% 15.6% (+12.9)#89 12.4% (+16.1)#4,342
90. Norris 28.6% 15.6% (+12.9)#90 12.4% (+16.1)#4,344
91. Lodge 28.6% 15.6% (+12.9)#91 12.4% (+16.1)#4,372
92. Plum Branch 28.6% 15.6% (+12.9)#92 12.4% (+16.1)#4,377
93. South Sumter 27.8% 15.6% (+12.2)#93 12.4% (+15.3)#4,471
94. Clearwater 27.5% 15.6% (+11.8)#94 12.4% (+15.0)#4,519
95. Olympia 27.3% 15.6% (+11.6)#95 12.4% (+14.8)#4,540
96. North Myrtle Beach 25.8% 15.6% (+10.1)#96 12.4% (+13.3)#4,754
97. Sumter 25.4% 15.6% (+9.75)#97 12.4% (+12.9)#4,792
98. Union 25.0% 15.6% (+9.37)#98 12.4% (+12.6)#4,821
99. Surfside Beach 25.0% 15.6% (+9.37)#99 12.4% (+12.6)#4,826
100. Lane 25.0% 15.6% (+9.37)#100 12.4% (+12.6)#4,902

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Carolina are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Carolina?
Hampton has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Carolina with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in the State of South Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Carolina is 15.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in the United States is 12.4%.