Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Male
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Oklahoma

City Single Male Poverty vs State vs National
1. Cleora 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#1 12.4% (+87.6)#142
2. Carlisle 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#2 12.4% (+87.6)#381
3. Ringwood 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#3 12.4% (+87.6)#392
4. Lone Wolf 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#4 12.4% (+87.6)#447
5. Arpelar 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#5 12.4% (+87.6)#524
6. Snake Creek 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#6 12.4% (+87.6)#547
7. Jennings 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#7 12.4% (+87.6)#549
8. Mill Creek 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#8 12.4% (+87.6)#583
9. Cedar Crest 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#10 12.4% (+87.6)#590
10. Watts 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#11 12.4% (+87.6)#591
11. River Bottom 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#12 12.4% (+87.6)#604
12. Lebanon 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#13 12.4% (+87.6)#643
13. Cloud Creek 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#14 12.4% (+87.6)#649
14. Elm Grove 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#15 12.4% (+87.6)#728
15. Fairmont 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#16 12.4% (+87.6)#755
16. Phillips 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#17 12.4% (+87.6)#796
17. Lookeba 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#18 12.4% (+87.6)#811
18. Osage 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#19 12.4% (+87.6)#813
19. Headrick 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#20 12.4% (+87.6)#814
20. Hanna 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#21 12.4% (+87.6)#822
21. Mulberry 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#22 12.4% (+87.6)#847
22. New Alluwe 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#23 12.4% (+87.6)#852
23. Moffett 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#24 12.4% (+87.6)#864
24. Skedee 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#25 12.4% (+87.6)#874
25. Webb City 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#26 12.4% (+87.6)#877
26. Terlton 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#27 12.4% (+87.6)#880
27. Clearview 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#28 12.4% (+87.6)#884
28. Shamrock 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#29 12.4% (+87.6)#887
29. Douglas 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#30 12.4% (+87.6)#897
30. Bradley 93.3% 15.8% (+77.6)#31 12.4% (+80.9)#925
31. Tushka 92.9% 15.8% (+77.1)#32 12.4% (+80.4)#928
32. Kingfisher 85.7% 15.8% (+69.9)#33 12.4% (+73.3)#993
33. Calvin 83.3% 15.8% (+67.6)#34 12.4% (+70.9)#1,042
34. Heavener 76.9% 15.8% (+61.2)#35 12.4% (+64.5)#1,157
35. Ketchum 75.0% 15.8% (+59.2)#36 12.4% (+62.6)#1,202
36. Mccurtain 75.0% 15.8% (+59.2)#37 12.4% (+62.6)#1,206
37. Wakita 75.0% 15.8% (+59.2)#38 12.4% (+62.6)#1,210
38. Twin Oaks 75.0% 15.8% (+59.2)#39 12.4% (+62.6)#1,213
39. Belfonte 75.0% 15.8% (+59.2)#40 12.4% (+62.6)#1,216
40. Devol 75.0% 15.8% (+59.2)#41 12.4% (+62.6)#1,222
41. Goodwell 73.7% 15.8% (+57.9)#42 12.4% (+61.2)#1,235
42. Delaware 71.4% 15.8% (+55.7)#43 12.4% (+59.0)#1,301
43. Moodys 70.8% 15.8% (+55.1)#44 12.4% (+58.4)#1,318
44. Hobart 70.7% 15.8% (+55.0)#45 12.4% (+58.3)#1,322
45. Depew 68.6% 15.8% (+52.8)#46 12.4% (+56.1)#1,379
46. Talihina 66.7% 15.8% (+50.9)#47 12.4% (+54.2)#1,438
47. Wayne 66.7% 15.8% (+50.9)#48 12.4% (+54.2)#1,442
48. Prue 66.7% 15.8% (+50.9)#49 12.4% (+54.2)#1,456
49. Covington 66.7% 15.8% (+50.9)#50 12.4% (+54.2)#1,460
50. Marshall 66.7% 15.8% (+50.9)#51 12.4% (+54.2)#1,463
51. Zeb 64.3% 15.8% (+48.5)#52 12.4% (+51.9)#1,542
52. Akins 64.3% 15.8% (+48.5)#53 12.4% (+51.9)#1,544
53. Walters 64.1% 15.8% (+48.3)#54 12.4% (+51.7)#1,554
54. Nicut 63.6% 15.8% (+47.9)#55 12.4% (+51.2)#1,572
55. Pawhuska 62.5% 15.8% (+46.7)#56 12.4% (+50.1)#1,607
56. Weleetka 62.2% 15.8% (+46.4)#57 12.4% (+49.7)#1,634
57. Keys 61.4% 15.8% (+45.6)#58 12.4% (+48.9)#1,662
58. Sunray 60.0% 15.8% (+44.2)#59 12.4% (+47.6)#1,727
59. Bennington 60.0% 15.8% (+44.2)#60 12.4% (+47.6)#1,746
60. North Miami 60.0% 15.8% (+44.2)#61 12.4% (+47.6)#1,747
61. Oaks 60.0% 15.8% (+44.2)#62 12.4% (+47.6)#1,748
62. Teresita 60.0% 15.8% (+44.2)#63 12.4% (+47.6)#1,750
63. Chandler 59.1% 15.8% (+43.3)#64 12.4% (+46.7)#1,781
64. Winchester 57.6% 15.8% (+41.8)#65 12.4% (+45.1)#1,834
65. Tyrone 57.1% 15.8% (+41.4)#66 12.4% (+44.7)#1,852
66. Shady Grove Cdp Cherokee County 54.7% 15.8% (+38.9)#67 12.4% (+42.3)#1,974
67. Fairfield 54.5% 15.8% (+38.8)#68 12.4% (+42.1)#1,989
68. Fort Supply 54.5% 15.8% (+38.8)#69 12.4% (+42.1)#1,993
69. Elmore City 53.8% 15.8% (+38.1)#70 12.4% (+41.4)#2,025
70. Wright City 53.8% 15.8% (+38.1)#71 12.4% (+41.4)#2,026
71. Stroud 51.1% 15.8% (+35.3)#72 12.4% (+38.7)#2,168
72. Central High 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#73 12.4% (+37.6)#2,213
73. Fletcher 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#74 12.4% (+37.6)#2,231
74. Gore 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#75 12.4% (+37.6)#2,232
75. Boswell 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#76 12.4% (+37.6)#2,252
76. Rocky Mountain 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#77 12.4% (+37.6)#2,269
77. Verden 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#78 12.4% (+37.6)#2,278
78. Crowder 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#79 12.4% (+37.6)#2,301
79. Westport 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#80 12.4% (+37.6)#2,311
80. Canadian Shores 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#81 12.4% (+37.6)#2,331
81. Milburn 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#82 12.4% (+37.6)#2,337
82. Foster 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#83 12.4% (+37.6)#2,341
83. Kemp 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#84 12.4% (+37.6)#2,345
84. Pittsburg 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#85 12.4% (+37.6)#2,368
85. Garvin 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#86 12.4% (+37.6)#2,371
86. Grayson 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#87 12.4% (+37.6)#2,375
87. Wainwright 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#88 12.4% (+37.6)#2,380
88. Summit 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#89 12.4% (+37.6)#2,389
89. Swink 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#90 12.4% (+37.6)#2,396
90. Tishomingo 48.9% 15.8% (+33.1)#91 12.4% (+36.4)#2,424
91. Okemah 47.1% 15.8% (+31.3)#92 12.4% (+34.7)#2,513
92. Afton 46.7% 15.8% (+30.9)#93 12.4% (+34.2)#2,539
93. Toppers 46.2% 15.8% (+30.4)#94 12.4% (+33.7)#2,584
94. Tonkawa Tribal Housing 46.2% 15.8% (+30.4)#95 12.4% (+33.7)#2,594
95. Amber 45.5% 15.8% (+29.7)#96 12.4% (+33.0)#2,625
96. Ames 45.5% 15.8% (+29.7)#97 12.4% (+33.0)#2,630
97. Temple 44.8% 15.8% (+29.1)#98 12.4% (+32.4)#2,664
98. Alva 44.7% 15.8% (+29.0)#99 12.4% (+32.3)#2,669
99. Yale 44.4% 15.8% (+28.7)#100 12.4% (+32.0)#2,681
100. Cyril 44.4% 15.8% (+28.7)#101 12.4% (+32.0)#2,687

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Oklahoma?
Cleora has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in the State of Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in Oklahoma is 15.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in the United States is 12.4%.