Chickasaw vs Yugoslavian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Yugoslavian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Yugoslavians
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
73.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Yugoslavian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,600,754 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 29.3%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 67.9% | 66.7% |
| Range | 63.9% | 64.4% |
| Mean | 25.6% | 15.4% |
| Median | 23.1% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.0% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.5% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Malaysian (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lebanon (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Native Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Sierra Leonean (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
| Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
| Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
| Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 73.0 /100 | #149 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 72.1 /100 | #150 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.6% |
| Australians | 71.4 /100 | #152 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 70.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 68.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 68.7 /100 | #155 | Good 12.7% |