Immigrants from Oceania vs Yugoslavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,179,207 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.822. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.350% in Yugoslavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 350.4 Yugoslavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $58,243, a difference of 10.6%), median household income ($89,100 compared to $82,186, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $91,368, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $53,967, a difference of 3.2%), median earnings ($47,617 compared to $45,846, a difference of 3.9%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.2%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.17%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 10.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.6%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.15, a difference of 4.6%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 0.88%), currently married (46.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.83%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.9%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (65.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), college, 1 year or more (59.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.5%).