Cherokee vs Thai Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cherokee
Thai
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cherokee
Thais
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,191
SOCIAL INDEX
99.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
2nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Thai Integration in Cherokee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 425,518,879 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Thais within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.166. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Thais. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 13.0 Thais.
Cherokee vs Thai Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Thai communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($72,682 compared to $110,648, a difference of 52.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $121,778, a difference of 50.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $129,560, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 11.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $59,187, a difference of 23.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $72,099, a difference of 33.2%).
Income Metric | Cherokee | Thai |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,203 | Exceptional $54,307 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,209 | Exceptional $131,281 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,682 | Exceptional $110,648 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,252 | Exceptional $59,237 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,669 | Exceptional $72,135 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,742 | Exceptional $47,577 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,848 | Exceptional $59,187 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,843 | Exceptional $121,778 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,125 | Exceptional $129,560 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,133 | Exceptional $72,099 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 30.5% |
Cherokee vs Thai Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Thai communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 76.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 69.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 33.6%).
Poverty Metric | Cherokee | Thai |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 17.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.5% | Exceptional 24.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Cherokee vs Thai Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Thai communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 47.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Cherokee | Thai |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Cherokee vs Thai Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Thai communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cherokee | Thai |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.9% | Exceptional 67.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Tragic 34.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Tragic 74.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.4% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 84.3% |
Cherokee vs Thai Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Thai communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 52.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 36.3%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.2%), family households (65.0% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 8.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Cherokee | Thai |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 67.2% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Exceptional 30.6% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.7% | Exceptional 51.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 50.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 24.0% |
Cherokee vs Thai Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Thai communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.55%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cherokee | Thai |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.9% | Exceptional 57.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Good 19.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Fair 6.2% |
Cherokee vs Thai Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Thai communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 91.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 90.3%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 86.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Education Level Metric | Cherokee | Thai |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Exceptional 91.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 89.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.1% | Exceptional 73.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.2% | Exceptional 68.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.9% | Exceptional 57.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 50.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cherokee vs Thai Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Thai communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 80.2%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 67.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 10.6%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.3%).
Disability Metric | Cherokee | Thai |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Males | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 20.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Exceptional 45.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.1% |