Bhutanese vs Thai Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 416,570,184 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Thais within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.535. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.086% in Thais. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 86.1 Thais.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Thai communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $72,135, a difference of 16.8%), median earnings ($52,297 compared to $59,237, a difference of 13.3%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $72,099, a difference of 0.26%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $59,187, a difference of 3.7%), and per capita income ($49,894 compared to $54,307, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Thai communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.3%), single female poverty (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and single male poverty (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Thai communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.21%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Thai communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Thai communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 16.0%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.88%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and family households (65.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Thai communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.55%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Thai communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 26.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.1%), and bachelor's degree (42.7% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Thai communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.0%), male disability (11.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.1%).