Luxembourger vs South African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,841,331 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.311. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.224% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 224.1 South Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and South African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $50,044, a difference of 9.6%), median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $61,460, a difference of 9.2%), and median household income ($86,418 compared to $93,379, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $51,383, a difference of 2.0%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $41,825, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and South African communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.8%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.020%), single female poverty (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and South African communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.2%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and South African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.26%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and South African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 91.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and South African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.4%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.8%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.7%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.4%).