Pima vs South African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,832,701 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.923. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.874% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 874.0 South Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and South African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $50,044, a difference of 63.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $109,719, a difference of 49.5%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $93,379, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,383, a difference of 0.23%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $41,825, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $103,160, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and South African communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 149.7%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 123.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 104.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 9.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 34.6%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 35.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 152.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 118.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 117.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and South African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 95.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 68.8%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and South African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 37.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and South African communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 95.7%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 87.7%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 77.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 75.9%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.4%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.7%).