Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Seminole Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,238,922 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Seminole. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Seminole.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $80,077, a difference of 14.1%), median family income ($94,472 compared to $83,354, a difference of 13.3%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $69,420, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $45,649, a difference of 6.8%), median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $46,783, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $52,373, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 22.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 20.3%), and single female poverty (22.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 5.9%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 17.4%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.3% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.78%), married-couple households (43.4% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.8%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 28.8%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.26%), 12th grade, no diploma (88.9% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and high school diploma (86.7% compared to 87.3%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 45.7%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 40.1%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.8%).