Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Seminole Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,911,247 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.187% in Seminole. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 186.8 Seminole.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $36,180, a difference of 43.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $80,077, a difference of 39.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $76,584, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $45,649, a difference of 19.1%), and median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $34,385, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 55.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 54.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.5%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.88%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.9%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 33.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.87%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 31.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 82.3%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 77.5%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 68.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 59.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 51.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 13.2%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.1%).