Luxembourger vs Pueblo Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pueblo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Pueblo

Excellent
Poor
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,100
SOCIAL INDEX
18.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
270th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pueblo Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,572,138 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.905. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.463% in Pueblo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 463.0 Pueblo.
Luxembourger Integration in Pueblo Communities

Luxembourger vs Pueblo Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $32,012, a difference of 42.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $68,910, a difference of 41.1%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $76,880, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $45,018, a difference of 11.9%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $52,930, a difference of 15.2%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $32,564, a difference of 22.5%).
Luxembourger vs Pueblo Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerPueblo
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$32,012
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$76,880
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$64,692
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$36,859
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$41,314
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$32,564
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$45,018
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$68,910
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$75,601
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$52,930
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
20.7%

Luxembourger vs Pueblo Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 186.6%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 135.3%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 118.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 23.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 28.9%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 30.4%).
Luxembourger vs Pueblo Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerPueblo
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
19.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
17.0%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
18.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
26.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
22.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
23.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
23.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
23.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
25.2%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
28.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
21.1%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
37.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
11.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
17.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
16.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
19.9%

Luxembourger vs Pueblo Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 86.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 71.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 67.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.6%).
Luxembourger vs Pueblo Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerPueblo
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
10.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
8.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.8%

Luxembourger vs Pueblo Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 29.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 72.6%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 11.7%).
Luxembourger vs Pueblo Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerPueblo
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
59.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
72.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
72.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
75.5%

Luxembourger vs Pueblo Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 82.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 48.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 7.1%), family households (63.3% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.1%).
Luxembourger vs Pueblo Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerPueblo
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
68.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
25.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
40.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.79
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
38.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
53.7%

Luxembourger vs Pueblo Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 100.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.3%).
Luxembourger vs Pueblo Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerPueblo
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
10.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Fair
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.6%

Luxembourger vs Pueblo Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 55.7%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 49.4%), and associate's degree (48.9% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).
Luxembourger vs Pueblo Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerPueblo
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Excellent
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
88.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
86.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
82.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
57.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
51.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
34.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
25.5%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
10.3%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Poor
1.7%

Luxembourger vs Pueblo Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 71.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 54.7%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.4%).
Luxembourger vs Pueblo Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerPueblo
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
15.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
33.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
55.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.3%