Czechoslovakian vs Pueblo Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pueblo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Pueblo

Good
Poor
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,100
SOCIAL INDEX
18.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
270th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pueblo Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,655,350 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.840. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.101% in Pueblo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 101.2 Pueblo.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Pueblo Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Pueblo Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $68,910, a difference of 38.0%), per capita income ($43,806 compared to $32,012, a difference of 36.8%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $45,018, a difference of 13.8%), householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $52,930, a difference of 14.5%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $32,564, a difference of 19.0%).
Czechoslovakian vs Pueblo Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianPueblo
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Tragic
$32,012
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Tragic
$76,880
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Tragic
$64,692
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Tragic
$36,859
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Tragic
$41,314
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Tragic
$32,564
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Tragic
$45,018
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Tragic
$68,910
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Tragic
$75,601
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Tragic
$52,930
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
20.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Pueblo Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 155.6%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 112.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 93.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 23.7%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 25.1%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 34.2%).
Czechoslovakian vs Pueblo Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianPueblo
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
19.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
17.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Tragic
26.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
22.2%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Tragic
23.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
23.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
23.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
25.2%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Tragic
28.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
21.1%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Tragic
37.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
11.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
17.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
16.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
19.9%

Czechoslovakian vs Pueblo Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 70.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 56.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.6%).
Czechoslovakian vs Pueblo Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianPueblo
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Tragic
10.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
8.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.8%

Czechoslovakian vs Pueblo Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 8.6%).
Czechoslovakian vs Pueblo Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianPueblo
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Tragic
59.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Tragic
72.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Tragic
72.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
75.5%

Czechoslovakian vs Pueblo Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 67.5%), single father households (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 42.3%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.7%), family households (64.6% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 7.2%).
Czechoslovakian vs Pueblo Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianPueblo
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
68.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
25.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
40.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.79
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
38.2%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Tragic
53.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Pueblo Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 37.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.0%).
Czechoslovakian vs Pueblo Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianPueblo
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
10.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Fair
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
8.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Pueblo Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 44.9%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 41.2%), and associate's degree (46.0% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.020%).
Czechoslovakian vs Pueblo Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianPueblo
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Excellent
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
88.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
86.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Tragic
82.3%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Tragic
57.4%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
51.5%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Tragic
34.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
25.5%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Tragic
10.3%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Poor
1.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Pueblo Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 50.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 43.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.8%).
Czechoslovakian vs Pueblo Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianPueblo
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
14.4%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
15.0%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
15.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
33.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
55.9%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
4.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
7.6%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
3.3%