Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Paraguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,924,528 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.877. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.255% in Paraguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 254.6 Paraguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 5.6%), median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $59,975, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $64,443, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $106,615, a difference of 0.26%), median household income ($95,319 compared to $95,737, a difference of 0.44%), and median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $43,173, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.53%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.020%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.4%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.92%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.2%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and college, under 1 year (69.6% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 0.050%), associate's degree (51.9% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 65.2%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.1%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.30%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.5%).