Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Paraguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,109,334 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Paraguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 10.3 Paraguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $50,385, a difference of 26.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $106,615, a difference of 22.9%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $95,737, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $64,443, a difference of 12.8%), wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $43,173, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 35.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 31.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 36.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 37.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 48.5%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.0%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 75.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 6.4%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.5%).