Luxembourger vs Okinawan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Okinawan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Okinawans

Excellent
Excellent
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,907
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
39th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Okinawan Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,082,166 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Okinawans within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.991. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.159% in Okinawans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 158.8 Okinawans.
Luxembourger Integration in Okinawan Communities

Luxembourger vs Okinawan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($86,418 compared to $106,624, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $119,349, a difference of 22.7%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $129,979, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $54,701, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $70,846, a difference of 16.2%).
Luxembourger vs Okinawan Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerOkinawan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Exceptional
$55,817
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Exceptional
$129,979
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Exceptional
$106,624
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Exceptional
$57,550
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Exceptional
$67,232
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Exceptional
$46,905
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Exceptional
$54,701
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Exceptional
$119,349
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Exceptional
$124,796
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Exceptional
$70,846
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
28.1%

Luxembourger vs Okinawan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 16.8%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.18%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.0%).
Luxembourger vs Okinawan Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerOkinawan
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
13.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
26.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
8.9%

Luxembourger vs Okinawan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.78%).
Luxembourger vs Okinawan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerOkinawan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Fair
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%

Luxembourger vs Okinawan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 38.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Luxembourger vs Okinawan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerOkinawan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Good
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
32.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Good
83.0%

Luxembourger vs Okinawan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.4%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.56%), family households (63.3% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.5%).
Luxembourger vs Okinawan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerOkinawan
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
62.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Exceptional
26.9%

Luxembourger vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 162.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 10.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.7%).
Luxembourger vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerOkinawan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
86.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
51.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.5%

Luxembourger vs Okinawan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 69.4%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 58.5%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.6% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.30%), 12th grade, no diploma (93.3% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
Luxembourger vs Okinawan Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerOkinawan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
73.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
69.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
57.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Exceptional
50.5%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Exceptional
22.6%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
3.3%

Luxembourger vs Okinawan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Luxembourger vs Okinawan Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerOkinawan
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
20.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%