Romanian vs Okinawan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Okinawan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Okinawans

Excellent
Excellent
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,907
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
39th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Okinawan Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,799,473 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Okinawans within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.127% in Okinawans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 126.9 Okinawans.
Romanian Integration in Okinawan Communities

Romanian vs Okinawan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($111,243 compared to $129,979, a difference of 16.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,544 compared to $119,349, a difference of 16.4%), and median household income ($91,994 compared to $106,624, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.61%), householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $54,701, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $70,846, a difference of 10.4%).
Romanian vs Okinawan Income
Income MetricRomanianOkinawan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Exceptional
$55,817
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Exceptional
$129,979
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Exceptional
$106,624
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Exceptional
$57,550
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Exceptional
$67,232
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Exceptional
$46,905
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Exceptional
$54,701
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Exceptional
$119,349
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Exceptional
$124,796
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Exceptional
$70,846
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
28.1%

Romanian vs Okinawan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 18.9%), receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 17.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.88%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Romanian vs Okinawan Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianOkinawan
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
13.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
26.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
8.9%

Romanian vs Okinawan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.81%).
Romanian vs Okinawan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianOkinawan
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Fair
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%

Romanian vs Okinawan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
Romanian vs Okinawan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianOkinawan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Good
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Tragic
32.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Good
83.0%

Romanian vs Okinawan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.5%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.99%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Romanian vs Okinawan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianOkinawan
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Tragic
62.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
26.9%

Romanian vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 10.7%).
Romanian vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianOkinawan
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Tragic
86.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Tragic
51.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
5.5%

Romanian vs Okinawan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 55.9%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 38.5%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.8% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%).
Romanian vs Okinawan Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianOkinawan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
73.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Exceptional
69.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Exceptional
57.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Exceptional
50.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Exceptional
22.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
3.3%

Romanian vs Okinawan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.9%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 6.7%).
Romanian vs Okinawan Disability
Disability MetricRomanianOkinawan
Disability
Good
11.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
20.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%