Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Moroccan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,427,931 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 2.7 Moroccans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $96,117, a difference of 22.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,222 compared to $100,138, a difference of 22.1%), and median household income ($104,796 compared to $86,468, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $53,256, a difference of 7.3%), median female earnings ($46,502 compared to $41,872, a difference of 11.1%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 37.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 34.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.1%), births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 27.0%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.060%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (64.9% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 18.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.3%), no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.2%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 32.7%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 25.3%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.9%).