Arapaho vs Moroccan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Moroccan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Moroccans
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,626
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
215th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Moroccan Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,986,129 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 12.0 Moroccans.
Arapaho vs Moroccan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $45,854, a difference of 41.8%), median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $56,499, a difference of 35.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $96,117, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $59,683, a difference of 0.51%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $53,256, a difference of 21.0%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Moroccan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Exceptional $45,854 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Good $104,488 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Good $86,468 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Exceptional $48,838 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Excellent $56,499 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Exceptional $41,872 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Exceptional $53,256 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Good $96,117 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Average $100,138 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Fair $59,683 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Exceptional 24.0% |
Arapaho vs Moroccan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 70.2%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 41.2%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.5%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Moroccan |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Fair 13.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 18.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 17.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Fair 12.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Fair 29.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 12.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Arapaho vs Moroccan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 140.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 131.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 129.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Moroccan |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 10.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Arapaho vs Moroccan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Moroccan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Poor 35.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Poor 82.5% |
Arapaho vs Moroccan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 48.1%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.5%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (41.8% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 4.0%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and family households (66.5% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 7.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Moroccan |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Tragic 61.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Average 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Tragic 44.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Average 31.8% |
Arapaho vs Moroccan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 99.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 90.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 66.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 8.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 23.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 66.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Moroccan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 85.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Tragic 48.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Tragic 15.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Arapaho vs Moroccan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 72.5%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 72.2%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 67.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.070%), high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.49%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Moroccan |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Poor 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Fair 90.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Fair 88.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Fair 85.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Average 65.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Good 60.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Excellent 48.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Exceptional 40.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Arapaho vs Moroccan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 36.9%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.7%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Moroccan |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Good 11.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Average 23.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Good 47.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.5% |