Choctaw vs Marshallese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Marshallese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Marshallese

Fair
Fair
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,873
SOCIAL INDEX
26.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
240th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Marshallese Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,377,181 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.427. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 14.4 Marshallese.
Choctaw Integration in Marshallese Communities

Choctaw vs Marshallese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $65,874, a difference of 24.1%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $78,930, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $48,137, a difference of 0.86%), median earnings ($40,270 compared to $41,969, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $83,575, a difference of 6.9%).
Choctaw vs Marshallese Income
Income MetricChoctawMarshallese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Tragic
$39,108
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Tragic
$95,293
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Tragic
$78,930
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Tragic
$41,969
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Tragic
$48,137
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Tragic
$36,459
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Tragic
$50,627
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Tragic
$83,575
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Tragic
$90,455
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Exceptional
$65,874
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
23.4%

Choctaw vs Marshallese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (20.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 22.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (17.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.3%), receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.4%).
Choctaw vs Marshallese Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawMarshallese
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
9.9%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
15.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
19.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
18.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
18.7%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
23.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Tragic
32.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
14.1%

Choctaw vs Marshallese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
Choctaw vs Marshallese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawMarshallese
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
11.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.6%

Choctaw vs Marshallese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
Choctaw vs Marshallese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawMarshallese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Tragic
78.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
39.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
80.3%

Choctaw vs Marshallese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.8%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (64.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 3.0%).
Choctaw vs Marshallese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawMarshallese
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Exceptional
3.38
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Tragic
34.8%

Choctaw vs Marshallese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 8.0%).
Choctaw vs Marshallese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawMarshallese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Fair
54.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
21.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.1%

Choctaw vs Marshallese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 16.2%), associate's degree (37.8% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%).
Choctaw vs Marshallese Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawMarshallese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Poor
90.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
61.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Tragic
55.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Tragic
31.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Choctaw vs Marshallese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 99.9%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 42.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and female disability (15.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 16.2%).
Choctaw vs Marshallese Disability
Disability MetricChoctawMarshallese
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
0.94%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
25.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Tragic
50.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.6%