Bhutanese vs Marshallese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,674,413 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 5.7 Marshallese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $83,575, a difference of 31.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $90,455, a difference of 30.2%), and median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $48,137, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $65,874, a difference of 9.7%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $50,627, a difference of 12.7%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 52.8%), single male poverty (11.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 48.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 42.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 39.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 24.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.3%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.38, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.1%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 48.5%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 27.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 24.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 6.4%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.9%).