Luxembourger vs Maltese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,095,676 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.810. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.769% in Maltese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 769.2 Maltese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $110,064, a difference of 13.2%), median household income ($86,418 compared to $97,015, a difference of 12.3%), and median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $62,953, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $53,735, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $66,027, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 18.8%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 18.6%), and single female poverty (20.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 22.5%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.9%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.3% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 0.55%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 70.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 12.5%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.0%), ged/equivalency (88.6% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.010%), and 9th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.9%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.31%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.74%).