Immigrants from Latvia vs Maltese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,620,508 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Maltese within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Maltese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to a decrease of 2.3 Maltese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 7.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,522 compared to $110,064, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $53,735, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $43,357, a difference of 0.60%), median family income ($114,826 compared to $115,862, a difference of 0.90%), and median earnings ($51,555 compared to $52,526, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.5%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 16.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.59%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (46.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 6.9%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.72%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and family households with children (25.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 32.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.9%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.19%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 8.6%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.80%).