Pima vs Lebanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,473,690 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Lebanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 9.5 Lebanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $45,840, a difference of 49.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $104,734, a difference of 42.8%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $88,091, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,355, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,006, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $97,339, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 111.5%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 106.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 101.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 19.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 31.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 40.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 151.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 117.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 98.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 94.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 74.2%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 63.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 6.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 78.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 74.1%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 71.6%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 54.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 11.8%).