Czechoslovakian vs Lebanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,542,343 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lebanese within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Lebanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to a decrease of 2.6 Lebanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $45,840, a difference of 4.6%), median family income ($103,273 compared to $107,086, a difference of 3.7%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $88,091, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $50,355, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $97,339, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.0%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 8.4%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.080%), family households (64.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.8%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.96%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.5%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.2%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.4%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.56%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 2.3%).