Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Zaire
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Immigrants from Zaire

Fair
Fair
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,349
SOCIAL INDEX
31.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
225th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zaire Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,388,293 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.691. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 3.5 Immigrants from Zaire.
Choctaw Integration in Immigrants from Zaire Communities

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 26.2%), per capita income ($35,999 compared to $38,848, a difference of 7.9%), and median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $36,017, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $78,045, a difference of 0.16%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $45,529, a difference of 0.17%), and median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $47,070, a difference of 1.4%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Income
Income MetricChoctawImmigrants from Zaire
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Tragic
$38,848
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Tragic
$89,285
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Tragic
$71,801
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Tragic
$41,325
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Tragic
$47,070
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Tragic
$36,017
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Tragic
$45,529
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Tragic
$78,045
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Tragic
$85,207
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Tragic
$54,512
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
22.3%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 24.9%), single father poverty (20.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and single female poverty (27.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.38%), receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawImmigrants from Zaire
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.1%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
16.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
25.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
15.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
21.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
20.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
20.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
13.6%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
23.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Tragic
32.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
13.4%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 28.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.9%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawImmigrants from Zaire
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.5%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 5.0%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawImmigrants from Zaire
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Exceptional
67.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
40.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Average
82.8%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (46.0% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 14.7%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.1%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawImmigrants from Zaire
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
59.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
40.1%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Tragic
42.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Tragic
34.5%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 53.1%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 37.6%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Zaire
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
11.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
88.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
16.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
5.1%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 38.0%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.0%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.10%), 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.50%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawImmigrants from Zaire
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Poor
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Poor
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Fair
94.6%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
91.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
84.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Poor
64.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Poor
58.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Poor
45.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Fair
36.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.0%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 65.1%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 59.6%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.2%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.6%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Disability
Disability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Zaire
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Fair
11.9%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
24.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
19.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.3%