Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,573,199 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.740. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.451% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 450.6 Immigrants from Zaire.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $85,207, a difference of 9.5%), per capita income ($35,720 compared to $38,848, a difference of 8.7%), and median family income ($82,216 compared to $89,285, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $36,017, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $45,529, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 12.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 2.0%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.6%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (59.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.43%), and currently married (41.1% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.2%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.3%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.6%).