Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Sudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,658,968 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Immigrants from Sudan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 29.3 Immigrants from Sudan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $46,791, a difference of 14.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $86,109, a difference of 13.4%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $79,103, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $38,511, a difference of 4.6%), median earnings ($47,617 compared to $44,767, a difference of 6.4%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $41,986, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 19.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (46.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 11.9%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 38.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 24.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.78%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.0%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.010%), ged/equivalency (85.5% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.99%).