Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Sudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,336,204 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.213% in Immigrants from Sudan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 213.4 Immigrants from Sudan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $93,781, a difference of 13.2%), median household income ($89,412 compared to $79,103, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $86,109, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $38,511, a difference of 6.4%), householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $59,248, a difference of 6.4%), and per capita income ($45,066 compared to $41,986, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 23.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.30%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 14.6%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.93%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 20.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.3%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.53%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.9%).