Osage vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,308,452 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.197% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 196.7 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $103,486, a difference of 22.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $107,775, a difference of 21.9%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $91,605, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $61,902, a difference of 11.2%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $42,275, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 34.6%), single male poverty (16.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 32.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.3%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.050%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and family households (63.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 49.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 36.1%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 32.2%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.28%), high school diploma (89.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 35.0%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 34.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 7.8%).