Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,878,304 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.166. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.089% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to a decrease of 89.2 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,631 compared to $103,486, a difference of 10.5%), median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $59,217, a difference of 10.3%), and median family income ($100,656 compared to $110,614, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $54,484, a difference of 3.8%), householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $61,902, a difference of 4.8%), and wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.35%), single female poverty (20.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.41%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.1%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.11%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.67%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.0%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.070%), 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.3%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.59%).