Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,624,182 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.068% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 67.8 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 11.7%), householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $66,620, a difference of 7.2%), and median female earnings ($44,757 compared to $41,771, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($114,586 compared to $114,392, a difference of 0.17%), median household income ($94,399 compared to $94,091, a difference of 0.33%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,430 compared to $112,175, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 30.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.5%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.060%), single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 18.5%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.12, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 101.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 40.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 10.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 22.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 34.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.0%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (69.2% compared to 69.4%, a difference of 0.38%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 34.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.19%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.7%).