Immigrants from Croatia vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,045,244 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.835. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.107% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to an increase of 107.4 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 9.5%), householder income over 65 years ($63,168 compared to $66,620, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,304 compared to $112,175, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($60,914 compared to $61,220, a difference of 0.50%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,503 compared to $105,089, a difference of 0.56%), and per capita income ($50,417 compared to $49,893, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.68%), single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.1%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and family households with children (25.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.12, a difference of 0.47%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.86%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 56.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 16.1%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and college, under 1 year (67.8% compared to 69.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (42.3% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 0.080%), 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.2%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.1%).