Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Moldova Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,925,086 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Immigrants from Moldova. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 25.8 Immigrants from Moldova.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $56,168, a difference of 9.3%), per capita income ($45,066 compared to $47,489, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $101,091, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $62,939, a difference of 0.16%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $107,357, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 13.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.4%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.18%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.1%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.65%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.90%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 13.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.2%), associate's degree (48.4% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and bachelor's degree (40.3% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.6%), disability (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.87%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.1%).