Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Moldova
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Moldova
5.2%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
90.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,341,260 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,231,836 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.769 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.99%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Moldova |
| Minimum | 0.90% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 13.2% | 33.8% |
| Range | 12.3% | 31.4% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 6.4% |
| Median | 5.4% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Moldova by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Germany (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Hungarian (5.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Brazil (5.2%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are Immigrants from Austria (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Romanian (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Denmark (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Estonian (5.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 90.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 90.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Romanians | 89.8 /100 | #114 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 89.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 89.4 /100 | #116 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Estonians | 89.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Cypriots | 88.8 /100 | #118 | Excellent 5.1% |
| French Canadians | 88.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Ukrainians | 88.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Mongolians | 88.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 88.2 /100 | #122 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 87.7 /100 | #123 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 87.5 /100 | #124 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 87.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 86.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Hungarians | 85.1 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 83.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Chickasaw | 82.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.2% |