Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,255,050 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.192. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 16.9 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,066 compared to $49,983, a difference of 10.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $107,650, a difference of 10.8%), and median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $62,121, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.020%), householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $65,497, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $54,179, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.27%), single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.3%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.72%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 57.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.0%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.5%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.8% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 0.29%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.45%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.78%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.8%).