Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,355,140 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 39.6%), median family income ($89,268 compared to $115,880, a difference of 29.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,035 compared to $112,796, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $54,179, a difference of 6.2%), median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $43,835, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,027 compared to $65,497, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 62.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 32.4%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.2%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 39.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 31.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 47.7%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 41.8%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 24.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 0.74%), no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 87.6%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 60.1%), and master's degree (13.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.4%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.6%).