Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Iraq Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,520,609 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.315% in Immigrants from Iraq. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 314.7 Immigrants from Iraq.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $41,365, a difference of 26.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,629 compared to $89,444, a difference of 19.2%), and median family income ($115,847 compared to $98,786, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.3%), householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $53,384, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,118 compared to $59,824, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.8%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and single father poverty (16.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.99%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.3%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.12%), currently married (47.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 53.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 4.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.7%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.5%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.55%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.090%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.82%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 0.87%).