Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Iraq Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,564,453 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.098% in Immigrants from Iraq. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to a decrease of 97.9 Immigrants from Iraq.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($107,715 compared to $98,786, a difference of 9.0%), per capita income ($45,066 compared to $41,365, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $89,444, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $53,384, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $59,824, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 13.5%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.88%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.7%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.090%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.80%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 20.0%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.2% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.27%), 9th grade (95.1% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and 8th grade (95.9% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.8%).