Immigrants from France vs Immigrants from India Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,744,899 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.512. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.130% in Immigrants from India. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to a decrease of 130.5 Immigrants from India.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($96,743 compared to $113,009, a difference of 16.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,680 compared to $132,488, a difference of 16.5%), and median male earnings ($63,715 compared to $74,207, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($54,557 compared to $55,268, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($44,541 compared to $48,292, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,826 compared to $72,804, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 37.8%), receiving food stamps (10.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 36.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 14.9%), single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and single female poverty (19.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 16.8%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 26.6%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 58.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 5.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (46.4% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 10.5%), professional degree (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from India communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 21.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 20.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 9.2%).