Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Hungary Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,699,031 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Hungary. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 0.3 Immigrants from Hungary.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $49,303, a difference of 9.0%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $59,806, a difference of 7.3%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $50,227, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $64,277, a difference of 0.22%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $52,798, a difference of 1.7%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $92,094, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.0%), male poverty (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and poverty (12.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.16%), single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.1%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.19%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and family households (64.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 19.6%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.40%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.7%).