Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Hungary Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,362,726 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.975. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.115% in Immigrants from Hungary. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 114.7 Immigrants from Hungary.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $49,303, a difference of 12.6%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $92,094, a difference of 8.4%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $59,806, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $52,798, a difference of 3.1%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $64,277, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.55%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.42%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.7%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (64.6% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 41.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.4%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.46%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.5%).