Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Haiti Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,774,187 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Haiti within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.828% in Immigrants from Haiti. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 828.1 Immigrants from Haiti.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 18.8%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $36,203, a difference of 15.8%), and median earnings ($45,596 compared to $40,550, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $51,219, a difference of 0.93%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $83,257, a difference of 2.8%), and median household income ($76,517 compared to $72,599, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 13.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.24%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 32.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 30.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.8%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.39, a difference of 1.5%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (62.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 143.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 67.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 35.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 62.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 64.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 18.5%), bachelor's degree (35.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and 10th grade (91.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 32.5%), hearing disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.6%).