Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from France Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,236,375 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.157. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Immigrants from France. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to a decrease of 28.4 Immigrants from France.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $54,557, a difference of 6.2%), wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $44,541, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($96,836 compared to $96,743, a difference of 0.10%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,149 compared to $108,257, a difference of 0.10%), and median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $63,715, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 22.7%), male poverty (9.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and poverty (10.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.3%), single male poverty (11.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.5%), married-couple households (48.6% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.26%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 31.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.6%), professional degree (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.2%).