Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from France Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,874,158 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.340% in Immigrants from France. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 339.7 Immigrants from France.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $54,557, a difference of 15.1%), median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $63,715, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $108,257, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $53,805, a difference of 3.6%), householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $66,826, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $44,541, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.050%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.6%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.97%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.4%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 31.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.0%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.0%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.34%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.87%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.0%).