Immigrants from Croatia vs Immigrants from Eritrea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,059,039 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.489. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.504% in Immigrants from Eritrea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to an increase of 504.4 Immigrants from Eritrea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 22.3%), median male earnings ($60,914 compared to $53,715, a difference of 13.4%), and per capita income ($50,417 compared to $44,509, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,258 compared to $41,485, a difference of 4.3%), householder income over 65 years ($63,168 compared to $60,096, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,343 compared to $51,574, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 27.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.0%), single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.1%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.6%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.3%), family households (63.1% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 22.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 46.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and master's degree (17.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.91%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.5%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.5%).