Pima vs Immigrants from Eritrea Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Eritrea
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Eritrea

Poor
Average
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,367
SOCIAL INDEX
51.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
178th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Eritrea Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,605,489 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.998. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Immigrants from Eritrea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 45.3 Immigrants from Eritrea.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Eritrea Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Eritrea Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $44,509, a difference of 45.3%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $85,025, a difference of 34.4%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $102,823, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,574, a difference of 0.14%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $93,466, a difference of 12.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Eritrea Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Eritrea
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Good
$44,509
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Average
$102,823
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Average
$85,025
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Excellent
$47,657
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Fair
$53,715
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$41,485
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Poor
$51,574
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Fair
$93,466
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Poor
$97,373
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Fair
$60,096
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Exceptional
21.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from Eritrea Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 93.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 87.7%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 86.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.21%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 28.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 36.1%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Eritrea Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Eritrea
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
9.9%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
14.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Tragic
18.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
18.7%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
30.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Poor
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Average
11.7%

Pima vs Immigrants from Eritrea Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 158.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 112.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 104.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 34.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Eritrea Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Eritrea
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Excellent
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Fair
5.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from Eritrea Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 17.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 13.5%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Eritrea Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Eritrea
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
68.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
81.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
83.8%

Pima vs Immigrants from Eritrea Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 66.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 62.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.5%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and family households (65.9% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 8.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Eritrea Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Eritrea
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
60.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Excellent
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
6.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Average
31.7%

Pima vs Immigrants from Eritrea Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.7%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 33.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Eritrea Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Eritrea
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Fair
10.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Fair
89.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Tragic
52.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
5.8%

Pima vs Immigrants from Eritrea Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 77.1%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 74.1%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.21%), 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Eritrea Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Eritrea
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.4%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Tragic
96.1%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Tragic
94.9%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
94.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
93.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
91.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Tragic
84.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Good
66.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Excellent
48.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
40.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
16.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from Eritrea Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 65.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 64.4%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.8%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Eritrea Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Eritrea
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Excellent
10.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Average
23.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%