Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,837,042 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.724. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.042% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to an increase of 1,041.6 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,027 compared to $48,535, a difference of 11.3%), wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and median family income ($89,268 compared to $83,319, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $50,757, a difference of 0.55%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,298 compared to $80,326, a difference of 3.7%), and median male earnings ($48,040 compared to $46,193, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 18.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.92%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.53%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.4%), divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.18%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.33, a difference of 0.25%), and currently married (41.1% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 37.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 0.57%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.4%), master's degree (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.42%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.20%), female disability (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.52%).