U.S. Virgin Islander vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,358,957 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.919% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to a decrease of 919.3 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,072 compared to $48,535, a difference of 7.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,448 compared to $50,757, a difference of 7.0%), and wage/income gap (21.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($71,853 compared to $71,860, a difference of 0.010%), median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $36,414, a difference of 0.030%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $82,513, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 18.7%), receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 18.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty (17.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and poverty (16.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.0%), family households (62.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and single mother households (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.41%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.33, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 27.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.59%), 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.12%), disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.3%).