Japanese vs Immigrants from Canada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 235,354,788 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.139. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Canada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Immigrants from Canada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,870 compared to $49,412, a difference of 23.9%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 19.7%), and median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $60,388, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $53,411, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($38,528 compared to $41,373, a difference of 7.4%), and median household income ($83,395 compared to $92,029, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 45.0%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.6%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.2%), and female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 32.6%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.99%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.7%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 104.5%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 50.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.88%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.0%).