Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Canada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,217,124 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Canada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to a decrease of 11.5 Immigrants from Canada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 10.7%), median female earnings ($44,757 compared to $41,373, a difference of 8.2%), and median earnings ($53,043 compared to $50,192, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($50,303 compared to $49,412, a difference of 1.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,430 compared to $109,402, a difference of 1.8%), and median family income ($114,586 compared to $112,374, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 22.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.11%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 18.7%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.48%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 91.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 9.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 20.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 30.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 27.5%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (69.2% compared to 69.1%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 41.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.080%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.5%).